Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Jul 1998 22:21:25 +0200
From:      Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: TESTERS NEEDED: Softupdates looks Very good.
Message-ID:  <19980710222125.B20745@klemm.gtn.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980710104545.5344A-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 10:48:04AM -0700
References:  <19980710191459.A4449@klemm.gtn.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95.980710104545.5344A-100000@current1.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 10:48:04AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Thanks. A commit yestaerday fixed one of the known problems.
> that leases us with only the 'hard to reproduce panic'.

Ah, fine !

> I'd say that if people have been hanging back from using soft updates for
> safety reasons, then it's possibly reached the stage where it's more risk
> to your filesystem to NOT use soft updates...  :-) 

Well argued ;-)

-- 
Andreas Klemm                                http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
     What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
          http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
             "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs)      ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980710222125.B20745>