Date: 01 May 1999 20:51:42 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Lars Fredriksen <lars@odin-corporation.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: default route not set up?? Message-ID: <xzphfpwwrlt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of "Sun, 02 May 1999 00:31:55 %2B0900" References: <372A1AE6.4E2738D4@odin-corporation.com> <xzpn1zpvyup.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <372AF60B.E11A6989@newsguy.com> <xzpiuadvsgw.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <372B1E6B.263A3B19@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes: > > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > [exerpt from /etc/rc.network] > > > Looking there, it *does* seem that there is a problem. defaultrouter > > > is only used to set route_default, which is *not* used. At least on > > > the code you quoted. > > This is getting fun :) Look closer at the first line I commented, then > > at the loop, and especially the eval. > That's tricky, indeed. You should have commented the line below the > second line, not the second line. :-) Yep. I was similarly miffed the first time I read this code, but I thought 'hey, it works, so it has to be right' and read it over until I was enlightened. I still find it slightly spaghetti. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphfpwwrlt.fsf>