Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 01:25:59 +0000 From: Jason Tubnor <jason@tubnor.net> To: FreeBSD virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net> Subject: Re: 14R bhyve RHEL9+NVME Message-ID: <20240212012559.Horde.aH5FMCkNv4j7GfULz1fq5rn@drive.tubnor.net> In-Reply-To: <678ac1d2-d00c-450e-bc2e-f9d979d19340@shrew.net> References: <678ac1d2-d00c-450e-bc2e-f9d979d19340@shrew.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Matthew, There is some underlying bug post 9.1 when it comes to Anaconda and the presented NVMe storage. I can't reproduce it with newer version of Anaconda that is present in Fedora. Uplifting in place from 9.1 to 9.3, there are no issues once the operating system is up and running, so it isn't a RHEL thing, just the installer. Cheers, Jason. "Matthew Grooms" mgrooms@shrew.net – 12 February 2024 11:32 AM > Hey All, > > Has anyone had experience installing either Rocky or Alma Linux 9.3 > using virtual NVME disks on a FreeBSD 14R host? I have no problem using > VirtIO block devices or if I downgrade to an 8.9 variant. However, using > NVME with a 9.3 variant will cause the installer to consistently fail on > my system. I'm not sure how to gather more data at this point as the > installer displays a wall of text that I'm not sure how to extract. I've > already burned a few hours on this so I thought I'd reach out to the > list to see if anyone else has already dug into this. If not, I'll see > what I can do to gather more info. For reference, here are the ISOs I've > tried installing from so far ... > > AlmaLinux-8.9-x86_64-boot.iso > AlmaLinux-9.3-x86_64-boot.iso > Rocky-9.3-x86_64-minimal.iso > > Thanks, > > -Matthew > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20240212012559.Horde.aH5FMCkNv4j7GfULz1fq5rn>