Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:51 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with same name Message-ID: <49E8556F.3090505@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> References: <200904161900.42681.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <b79ecaef0904160852r55438408u8f6e2839d2d352d0@mail.gmail.com> <200904162016.25524.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru> <200904171047.56671.oleg.ginzburg@nevosoft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
>
> cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> make install
> ...
> (i have deco archivers)
> pkg_add -r deco
>
> (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
>
> pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> [Updating the pkgdb <format:bdb_btree> in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found
> (-1 +1) (...). done]
> deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
>
> pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
Can you open a PR for this problem? I think it is really bad. If two
ports are installing same files, then there must be set CONFLICTS in
Makefile.
The next thing is that I think there should not be the two ports with
the same name.
Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E8556F.3090505>