Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 14:55:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Paul Richards <paul@isl.cf.ac.uk> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oops Message-ID: <199501061455.OAA07541@isl.cf.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <7410.789366216@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jan 5, 95 08:23:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who said > I think that's a little overstated. Thud's testing role is not > disputed, but it's rarely, if ever, gotten spammed so badly that the > core CVS tools no longer worked. Well, at least no more often than > freefall's core CVS tools have! :-) It's more used for testing *ports* > nowadays than for the actual system itself. That last outage showed > that thud has sort of became too useful to screw up at will now! It's > got too much storage on it, for one thing, and I think that thud is > fated to become a Real Machine(tm) and start providing services that > need to be offloaded from freefall. > Fine, if we agree to do this I become less concerned but it means we must ensure thud is as well maintained as freefall from now on and we may as well offload some things to it completely. Maybe move cvs entirely to thud and keep freefall for the lists. We should change the root password too since thud's is hardly secure. It'd be easiest if we made it the same as freefall's so we won't all have to phone the US to get the new one then. -- Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. Phone: +44 1222 874000 x5958 (work), +44 1222 457651 (home) Dept. Mechanical Engineering, University of Wales, College Cardiff. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, JANET(UK): RICHARDSDP@CARDIFF.AC.UK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501061455.OAA07541>