Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 21:22:11 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@estienne.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lfs ? Message-ID: <199502250522.VAA02279@estienne.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 24 Feb 1995 20:41:16 PST." <199502250441.UAA16372@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Is it still the case that having more than one LFS on a machine is stupid ? >-- >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> >TRW Financial Systems, Inc. >I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated. Having even one LFS on a system (other than 2.0R) is stupid. Once LFS is reintegrated into current, having more than one will be possible. -- Justin T. Gibbs ============================================== TCS Instructional Group - Programmer/Analyst 1 Cory | Po | Danube | Volga | Parker | Torus ==============================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502250522.VAA02279>