Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 05:16:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214248] mergesort_r should exist Message-ID: <bug-214248-8-FMs8k3t5dn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-214248-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-214248-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214248 Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cem@freebsd.org Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |cem@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- Yeah, agreed. It looks like we're moving towards standardizing qsort_r on thunk-last (the opposite of the current qsort_r), so that the non-thunk version can share code with the thunk version. See http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=900 and https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9169 . I'd add it similarly to mergesort. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214248-8-FMs8k3t5dn>