Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 13:09:38 -0700 (PWT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BitKeeper (was Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905011309260.16888-100000@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <19432.925584866@brown.pfcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As I understand it, BitKeeper is indeed based on SCCS, and is a superset of > it. The performance hit of SCCS has been "solved". > > There are several "significant" commercial users of BitKeeper waiting for > the first production release, and Larry McVoy seems to be a bit of a maniac > when it comes to things being production stable. > > He said that a CVS->BitKeeper conversion tool is not far off. Cool! > > I'm mostly interested in the "lines of development" features, the ability > to check in various revisions of my *local* work, the ability to apply a > patch set as an atomic unit, and several of the GUI tools. > Amen to that.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9905011309260.16888-100000>