Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 21:29:45 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@monkeys.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/11987: vacation(1) documentation and error logging both suck Message-ID: <19990610212945.A3398@mad> In-Reply-To: <84942.929055712@axl.noc.iafrica.com>; from Sheldon Hearn on Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:01:52AM %2B0200 References: <19990610183419.B1476@mad> <84942.929055712@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> Alternatively, and this is what I think would be best, scrap
> .vacation.log and write to stderr. It's easy enough to redirect to a
> file from .forward -- I'll even supply an example in the manpage. This
I like that far more than anything else suggested.
> Well it won't be me doing the commit; check avail. :-)
Man, you really got gyped. ;-) There's a rumour going around that
it's actually possible to commit without being in the avail file.
Talk to Robert Baron for more info. ;-)
> Well, there's no mention of _why_ they grok Return-Path. I checked their
> commit message and couldn't find "vacation" and "Return-Path" in the
> same message on _any_ of their searchable mailing list archives.
Who knows. It really only matters for the cases where From: and
Return-Path: are different. I suppose it's probably correct to take
the Return-Path: .... WTF is strlcpy()?
(RFC 822: Return-Path: "definitive ... route back to the message's
originator"
From: "the identity of the person who wished this message to
be sent."
)
--
This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990610212945.A3398>