Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu,  2 Mar 95 15:38:30 IST
From:      "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" <ugen@netvision.net.il>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>, Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.org, ugen@netvision.net.il
Subject:   Re: Playing with ipfw... 
Message-ID:  <Chameleon.950302153958.ugen@ugen.NetManage.co.il>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>perhaps the external language could accept
>
>"ipfw addf accept udp between 0/0 520 and 0/0"
>
>and expand it into the two non-symetrical rules.
Yeh..i think i already talked with someone about possibility of
completely different extarnal language expanding to firewall entries..
This is something one can do even now..Well..firewall itself will 
change anyway but such language can give user a good choice..my ipfw
interface is just straightforward interface to ipfw iocontrols..:))

-- 
-=Ugen J.S.Antsilevich=-
NetVision - Israeli Commercial Internet          |  Learning 
E-mail: ugen@NetVision.net.il                    | To Fly. [c]
Phone : +972-4-550330                            |   





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Chameleon.950302153958.ugen>