Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:10:58 -0500 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> Cc: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! Message-ID: <c87c50fd-5f5c-1186-9147-cedd9f1ff17e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> References: <dvvl9chf9h22dpjto35d44enid819p9rnc@4ax.com> <h91m9cpbmp6js1km1bson74he5uuui9r6h@4ax.com> <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <ndjm9cl4samqgioi25ro8p2q6liimvr1h4@4ax.com> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <AE0D514C-D235-462D-B31D-66FC619D9F4D@lastsummer.de> <451770c6-f2d3-6ca4-183e-532ea5f1ee89@FreeBSD.org> <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> Cc: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <c87c50fd-5f5c-1186-9147-cedd9f1ff17e@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! References: <dvvl9chf9h22dpjto35d44enid819p9rnc@4ax.com> <h91m9cpbmp6js1km1bson74he5uuui9r6h@4ax.com> <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <ndjm9cl4samqgioi25ro8p2q6liimvr1h4@4ax.com> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <AE0D514C-D235-462D-B31D-66FC619D9F4D@lastsummer.de> <451770c6-f2d3-6ca4-183e-532ea5f1ee89@FreeBSD.org> <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> --e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 02/09/2017 11:01, Franco Fichtner wrote: >=20 >> On 9 Feb 2017, at 4:47 PM, Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> They're supposed to upgrade to a supported version of FreeBSD. >=20 > pkg won't refuse the upgrade. And at least if it upgraded, it > should not break itself. Even if the update of pkg were done before the upgrade of the OS, if the user ran "freebsd-update" to upgrade to 10.3, the version of pkg that it updated to would work properly. > Imagine a GUI-driven appliance being bricked. There is nobody > who can tell it "fetch ports and build pkg to keep using it". Vendors should be building their own packages. > Don't get me wrong. Automation around pkg is really good, though > that doesn't warrant it's perfect (yet). I agree it's good, and nothing is ever perfect. Steve --e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2-- --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGnBAEBCgCRFiEEmPpBSlwqDvnP0K0N9c9isyB7G6EFAliclJJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk4 RkE0MTRBNUMyQTBFRjlDRkQwQUQwREY1Q0Y2MkIzMjA3QjFCQTETHHN3aWxsc0Bm cmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRD1z2KzIHsbocnhB/91AMbXXkmvv5gmw+9Ryo6ENF6UxFN1 WTMjqgOpv7afm9dzuD1m1xq4K+PpSaRa2K5ND1VZIs3cszNHUTBokeHoWDRliB1o eFAkbHRShE8oX4v+Ow1yG+QkV0Mj1pT0eORLFLNd30aJbyHWU5muO1hLp8NNQw7r nGI2C5Evy18miJJzS/EYT8GRWuHvgOLraivd2cLU/TqkWgXRGMKTSGFnPLD2C/jy pTFHMc2OpD4d4pCQMcPpZSv9MKJAQU46tQu6lPfy/dtF/OErVl/ltuGpLNICww3l flXRnUQo6molzmbU0LlkuAtaR6H2+XapXGk46YscZDutqIFnjuCfJJzi =JCq4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c87c50fd-5f5c-1186-9147-cedd9f1ff17e>