Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:26:56 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Tim Clewlow <tim1timau@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5 Message-ID: <20061130202656.GO69556@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <571063.87057.qm@web50304.mail.yahoo.com> References: <571063.87057.qm@web50304.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:36:10AM -0800, Tim Clewlow wrote: > > --- Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net> wrote: > > > From: Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net> > > To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:06:40 -0500 > > Subject: Something is really not right with azureus 2.5 / diablo-jdk 1.5 > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have azureus-2.5.0.0 which requires diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01_1 to build > > (among > > > other things). It builds and runs fine, however, azureus limps along for > > about > > > 10 minutes with very low download and upload speeds, then it seems to grind > > to > > > a halt, the d/l and u/l basically stop. There are no errors to report > > because > > > the application keeps going, but the problem is it stops actually d/l or > > u/l > > > anything (sometimes you might get short bursts of extremely slow speeds, > > but it > > > is mostly 0 B/s). > > > > > > I suspect that diablo-jdk that is at fault, but in truth this is just a > > hunch. > > > > This is a problem with azureus, not the jdk. The same issue exists with > > sun jdk15. I am attempting to look at the code, but someone with more > > java foo than I would probably be much more productive. It appears to > > be an issue with socket handling... > > > > robert. > > > > FYI - I discovered the internet connection was constantly at 100% u/l due to a > number of people on the LAN doing p2p, so I shaped the external link to only > allow 80% of the real uplink capacity (which creates a 20% buffer to attempt to > mininize collisions on the uplink) and azureus suddenly came back to life. Note > that azureus on the windows box was happy before I shaped the link, but the BSD > version was not. This makes me think the BSD version of azureus gets into > trouble when outgoing packets get lost due to packet collision. > > Tim. Does this thing use nio ? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFbz6QC3+MBN1Mb4gRAlHfAKC7VkfoemxhEKQeElHOYI9mBBE4FQCfZujY dUc5P7E3+W4jKCBzcVRNItQ= =bPD5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061130202656.GO69556>