Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:03:41 -0400 From: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: Garrett Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r301681 - stable/9/sys/rpc Message-ID: <0DFEB3AC-B864-47B5-8261-83E68989385A@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201606081850.u58IotT0022829@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201606081850.u58IotT0022829@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 8, 2016, at 14:50, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> = wrote: >=20 > In message <201606081823.u58INXvL053444@repo.freebsd.org>, Garrett = Cooper > write > s: >> Author: ngie >> Date: Wed Jun 8 18:23:33 2016 >> New Revision: 301681 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301681 >>=20 >> Log: >> MFstable/10 r301680: >>=20 >> MFC r300625: >=20 > Why MFC to stable/10 and then to stable/9. Doesn't that make stable/10 > stable/9's ancestor? When stable/9 was first branched,HEAD was its > ancestor. Doesn't this cause confusing ancestry in the branch? Good question! Yes; it makes ^/stable/10 ^/stable/9=E2=80=99s ancestor for changes from = ^/head, even though the ancestry was the other way around (^/stable/9 is = ^/stable/10=E2=80=99s ancestor, chronologically=E2=80=A6 but = content-wise ^/stable/9 is a subset really of everything in ^/stable/10 = and ^/head). There have been a few discussions about this on the = developer=E2=80=99s list, and the general consensus was a trickle down = method, i.e. =E2=80=9Cmerge from head to head-1; merge from head-1 to = head-2; etc=E2=80=9D. There=E2=80=99s some minor disagreement on content in the MFC messages, = but the way I have things right now is the preferred format AFAIK, i.e. = less people have nitpicked the messages, content-wise. After I fix the small formatting annoyance with my MFCs vs others, I was = thinking of putting out the scripts I use for CR; it would be nice for = everyone to be using the same tools. Thanks! -Ngie --Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXWGwNAAoJEPWDqSZpMIYVUk4P/RfKlkREJILEM5Q/njQbabPk eSDQw0I+8EYkfGPxbd1E15CXE44R2424gck0r4mdFm11Pm2puGIuC+4aipuggMV+ 3MN7nZgQAstIRZHUGII9TSTFyWpE8zvbkZuOkl75YlHTd0U0bj7gCuMyXrA7+ub0 NxSFm22OeqSayeysd2aut4UUCgD6gm7Pde36fZG/ZebVOLz+WEIVzklkOSpiE7X6 UfvH0qoW4WarnhNC6mTnc7fFH1RYvThRNxS5diqvVzUsCjFiOfvr6ifmHlT+p2b+ 7qxd5mQiSN8QbnEMmwIBYFaZgHFC8z5bQaMBO5R1KaKXkxO5oBfHAqI+77bfJNXy eDNIRR+Cwwebxzpg4NEexnnAfUOJC1A6UOxvHzr578+QVfWPlYd1l8o2m2u6641R nFC037FiHvUuf0frQk1r7c4ftNsoo+9qwv9u1ldTue+Yha5VAQI8/kpBZFVo5U7U 4d9k7kPnrI+3ly5lOHA8B3kxRvvxR1VYiQemKI3iyX3qZ7IkU9XtncR0hXZbxOin txjyHFsHHTqwE/2jZMLEOqzoBSyGdlqOXc2LC1NeCEHJiJMFrq3OyGxni4Lv41uh yX0IYFGR5AtNKCPhxqh2CxmQ34K8WQPgLmQgno044FKHRgknlZ38Z3FJH7hxlJt6 ZulGKhQqDq0x5bEy71Nh =RdbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0DFEB3AC-B864-47B5-8261-83E68989385A>