Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 11:39:24 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV) Cc: phk@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, uhclem.ds3@nemesis.lonestar.org Subject: Re: bin/1037 Message-ID: <19970920113924.CS57824@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <m0xCFSf-000tydC@nemesis.lonestar.org>; from Frank Durda IV on Sep 19, 1997 21:39:00 -0600 References: <m0xCFSf-000tydC@nemesis.lonestar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Frank Durda IV wrote: > Uh, pity you did that without asking. This item has not been fixed, > despite me providing a one line patch that fixed this and a handfull of > other open PRs (at least two not from me) back in March. > -----FIX BEGINS----- > *** telnetd.c.00 Sun Jan 12 15:56:33 1997 > --- telnetd.c Wed Feb 26 16:07:15 1997 > *************** > *** 179,184 **** > --- 179,187 ---- > > progname = *argv; > > + linemode=1; /*Default to mode that all brands > + of telnets handle correctly*/ > + > #ifdef CRAY > /* > * Get number of pty's before trying to process options, > -----FIX ENDS----- I don't see why you not just start your telnetd with `-l', instead of adding another hack to it. It's arguable whether we should start it with -l by default, since so many telnet clients in the world are apparently broken. But you've got the option, so why don't you use it in the first place? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970920113924.CS57824>