Date: Sat, 09 Oct 1999 21:06:17 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <37FF9229.655566A4@scc.nl> References: <199910091850.LAA52835@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > > > Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > > > > These patches change the interface of suser(9). All uses of > > > suser in the source tree have been updated, but 3rd-party KLDs, > > > at least, would be broken by this change. > > > > > > As I see it, there are these options: > > > = Damn the binary compatibility. Go ahead and commit it. > > > Inform any known vendors about the change and encourage > > > them to make the trivial updates needed. > > > > This is not an option. > > I disagree, binary compatibility has continuously been broken > in -stable, why is it now suddenly ``not an option''. We had > to redoply 2 times during our attempt to beta test 3.3 due to > changes in binary compatibility in less than a 14 day period!! The fact that it has been done before doesn't mean it's ok to do it again. Given the alternatives Jacques presented, breaking binary compatibility is totally unnecessary and therefore not an option. IMO, of course :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37FF9229.655566A4>