Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:49:26 +0200 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik+lists@cederstrand.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Royce Williams <royce@tycho.org> Subject: Re: [GSoC] Machine readable output from userland utilities Message-ID: <8DDBACB5-749B-4660-B1DE-F2EE51033D96@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <537C63DF.1090402@mu.org> References: <49E9736E-AD14-4647-8B15-30603D01360C@mail.bg> <91FE2526-F21C-42AB-BECB-058DBA975A9E@cederstrand.dk> <537C2993.1060206@mu.org> <E9594D41-64FE-4957-98FD-4E52BCCB2598@cederstrand.dk> <CA%2BE3k91obr3AVGEme5sVU2NQy0scmeT6beN6E9WUz5a6gUnMbQ@mail.gmail.com> <537C63DF.1090402@mu.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Den 21/05/2014 kl. 10.29 skrev Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>: > > This is a great idea. Having compat formats is very important. > > That said there are a few things here we can do to keep the scope of this project down to something doable by a student as well as very useful for FreeBSD. > > First off we can decide that without any additional specification that v1.0 is the default version, it then becomes up to the app to ask for v2.0, v2.1, etc at a later date. To keep the scope even further down, why not just adopt the same policy regarding API stability and deprecation as the rest of the FreeBSD project? Erikhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8DDBACB5-749B-4660-B1DE-F2EE51033D96>