Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:41:35 +0000 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <jspedron@club-internet.fr> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: My project wish-list for the next 12 months Message-ID: <d9175cad0412021341687dadf1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <41AF8A18.8090303@club-internet.fr> References: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> <d9175cad04120211484ab34445@mail.gmail.com> <41AF8A18.8090303@club-internet.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> 4. Journaled filesystem. > > > > The stage of the current implementation is, as I said, read-only. > > Further, it's currently i386 only. > > In theory, it shouldn't be tied to i386, but I never tested it somewhere > else unfortunately. > Got that from the reiserfs port which says it doesn't compile other than under i386. > > However, I think that there is enough interest in this new (and > > relatively exciting) filesystem that we may be able to find some > > developers with time (Possibly including myself) and desire to try to > > implement write support and do some porting. To ease any qualms > > with regards to licensing, it appears > > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-October/040998.html) > > that the current implementation is BSD licensed. > > Not exactly. Only the mount_reiserfs command is under BSD. The kernel > module is GPL. > Oh, I'm sorry. I guess I read quickly and w/o thinking enough. I suppose that would put is near square 1. > I don't know neither JFS nor XFS, but Reiser4 may be a great candidate > too (the current port is ReiserFS 3.6 only). It sure doesn't have the > maturity of ReiserFS but brings nice features. That would be nice if the support could be gathered for it. I do like it better than XFS (which I've tried). -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9175cad0412021341687dadf1>