Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:01:35 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: bin/15906: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition Message-ID: <200001051401.PAA48674@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 15906
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Jan 5 06:10:01 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Christian Weisgerber
>Release: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
What's the type of rcmd(3)'s second parameter, int or u_short?
Man page:
int
rcmd(char **ahost, int inport, const char *locuser, const char *remuser,
const char *cmd, int *fd2p)
Prototype in /usr/include/unistd.h:
int rcmd __P((char **, int, const char *,
const char *, const char *, int *));
Actual definition in src/lib/libc/net/rcmd.c:
int
rcmd(ahost, rport, locuser, remuser, cmd, fd2p)
char **ahost;
u_short rport;
const char *locuser, *remuser, *cmd;
int *fd2p;
Which instances should be fixed?
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001051401.PAA48674>