Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 05:42:16 -0500 From: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS Message-ID: <20000714054216.B30847@holly.calldei.com> In-Reply-To: <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007121328020.49102-100000@mx.webgiro.com> <20000712144510.A11316@ywing.creative.net.au> <200007130537.WAA29614@apollo.backplane.com> <20000714112117.D17372@ywing.creative.net.au> <xzppuohggib.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20000714053540.A30847@holly.calldei.com> <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, July 14, 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote: > As I said in my previous email, persistence isn't the primary problem > in my eyes. There are many ways people can handle it. What I see as being > an interesting problem is handling devfs across multiple process/group > namespaces (jail/chroot) without cluttering up your mount table. That's not a devfs problem, that's a general problem. The same problem exists for procfs and we already have that. :) -- |Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> |women.tar.gz: A great program, but it doesn't come with documentation... `------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000714054216.B30847>