Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:53:23 +0200 From: Guido Falsi via desktop <desktop@FreeBSD.org> To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: lightdm maintainership Message-ID: <47b358f9-7d1e-87fa-b64f-ed307af3744d@madpilot.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all! Recently maintainership for lightdm ports has been put back to the pool for personal reasons. I am keeping the xfce ports updated it is an optional dependency of the xfce port and a common choice for a display manager. In fact it is what I usually suggest if asked about it. I have been thinking of taking maintainership as myself or as xfce@ for x11/lightdm and x11/lightdm-gtk-greeter since I use them and they are a common choice for xfce and I use them. Before doing this I thought, since I bet they are a common choice for other desktop environment users as well, if it would be more appropriate to assign them to desktop@. Any thought on this? Also I can't remember rules for implicit approval to desktop@maintainer ports. Are people from kde@ xfce@ gnome@ (etc.) automatically included? -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47b358f9-7d1e-87fa-b64f-ed307af3744d>