Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:35:02 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: chukharev@mail.ru Cc: "freebsd-qa@freebsd.org" <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: About ports QA by 'port test' Message-ID: <7d6fde3d1003141435s70deaba7o2d61ae4187359471@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.u89g6dh3mhpy7y@vova-vaio> References: <op.u89g6dh3mhpy7y@vova-vaio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/3/8 <chukharev@mail.ru>: > Recently I've been trying to run some additional tests during updating > the ports I have installed on my computer. That means I select a number > of oldest installed ports (using dates of directories in /var/db/pkg/), > and for each of them run 'port test' (ports-mgmt/porttools) and then > 'portupgrade -f'. > > FYI, the 'port test' uses portlint, builds in a different place, installs > into a different place, packages, then de-installs and checks for left > files. No jail, no chroot. > > =A0From what I have seen till now, about 25% of the ports do not pass the > test, either for fatal errors from portlint or due to errors exhibited > because of PREFIX and PKG_DBDIR variables. And this is done only for > the ports I have successfully installed on my system for some reason > not connected to the QA purposes. > > I do not want to trouble the port maintainers with direct e-mails. > > I've been posting the results (and the original description I'm modifying > now) to freebsd-qa@ for a while, but that turned out to be of some burden > and also I received there no feedback at all. > Therefore I set a webpage at my day-job where I will copy the results. > I hope I will not need to keep the site for long, if running 'port test' > is found useful, it should be added into QAT or tinderbox, I think. Thoug= h > without jail it is faster I guess. > > The URL: http://kemia.me.tut.fi/~chu/FreeBSD.port_tests/ > Current statistics: If the host was reachable... > Ports having fatal errors: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 109 (21 %) > Ports having warnings: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 216 (43 %) > Ports without fatal errors: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0391 (78 %) > Ports having warnings or fatal errors: 325 (65 %) > Totally tested ports: =A0 =A0 =A0 500 > > Additionally to the above stats, java/jdk16 is interactive and hangs on > input > despite of BATCH=3Dyes in /etc/make.conf. Thanks, -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d1003141435s70deaba7o2d61ae4187359471>