Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 13:48:17 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files Message-ID: <199802060318.NAA27642@cain.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Feb 1998 04:09:48 BST." <19980206040948.49901@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There are good sides of their model, too - you have a centralized > place to throw changes at, and the person taking care of that area > have to either reject or accept - ignoring is not really an option. Whats the difference between that, and me just mailing a committer (or -current) with my groovy new patch? The central person in the Linux model could just ignore it (like what happens on -current ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- |Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software | |http://www.gsoft.com.au | |The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to| |choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802060318.NAA27642>