Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:27:52 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228737 - head/share/man/man4 Message-ID: <201112200927.52405.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201112201412.pBKECpWd019574@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201112201412.pBKECpWd019574@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:12:51 am Alexander Motin wrote: > Author: mav > Date: Tue Dec 20 14:12:50 2011 > New Revision: 228737 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228737 > > Log: > Remove extra "and" left from earlier version. > > Modified: > head/share/man/man4/apic.4 > > Modified: head/share/man/man4/apic.4 > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/man/man4/apic.4 Tue Dec 20 13:53:31 2011 (r228736) > +++ head/share/man/man4/apic.4 Tue Dec 20 14:12:50 2011 (r228737) > @@ -54,8 +54,7 @@ and the I/O APIC. > There is one LAPIC in each CPU in the system. > There is typically one I/O APIC for each peripheral bus in the system. > .Pp > -LAPICs manage all external and interrupts for specific processor in an > -SMP system. > +LAPICs manage all external interrupts for specific processor in an SMP system. > In addition, they are able to accept and generate inter-processor interrupts > (IPIs). > .Pp Hmm, can you call it a "local APIC" rather than LAPIC? The Intel manuals all use the longer form. Also, 'for a specific processor' reads better. Note that some UP systems have CPUs with local APICs as well, so they are not specific to SMP systems. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201112200927.52405.jhb>