Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 11:39:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina) Cc: bde@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vnode_if.sh Message-ID: <199509111839.LAA03668@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199509111624.JAA11339@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at Sep 11, 95 09:24:45 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm against continuing the anti-ansi mood we should go to full prototyping asap. no-one makes compilers that can't handle that any more.... > > Maybe it's time to ask the general question: > > Why do we care about non-ansi compilers? > > Almost every compiler out there today can handle ansi definitions. > For people engaging in bootstrap/porting, they can always use ansi2knr. > > Let's just settle on one standard. I don't care which, but I wish to > hell we'd just answer the general question first. > > Paul > > From: Bruce Evans <bde@freefall.freebsd.org> > Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vnode_if.sh > bde 95/09/11 09:05:17 > > Modified: sys/kern vnode_if.sh > Log: > Generate prototypes for VOP functions. I decided to keep the old-style > definitions even though the functions are inline. If vnode_if.h was > compiled by a non-ANSI compiler, then `inline' would be defined away, > so vnode_if.h might compile correctly. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509111839.LAA03668>