Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:20:28 +0200 From: "J.R. Oldroyd" <fbsd@opal.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression radeonkms r690 between r265233M and r268249 Message-ID: <20140714212028.20059a11@shibato> In-Reply-To: <53C2C48D.6090800@dumbbell.fr> References: <20140713163234.757f537a@shibato> <53C2C48D.6090800@dumbbell.fr>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:40:29 +0200 Jean-Sébastien Pédron <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> wrote: > > Hello! > > I don't think commits made to sys/dev/drm2 during this period are > critical enough. > > Can you try with syscons instead of vt? If you have some time, can you > bisect commits between those two dates? > Bonsoir ! Okée, I did some tests... None of the GENERIC/syscons kernels that I tested work with radeonkms. It always fails at init of the ring command processor. Tested: r265233, r265470, r266092, r266931 -- all fail But using the VT config and the same sources, I found: r265233 and r265289 -- these work r265470 -- this fails Most of the changes between r265289 and r265470 do not appear to be relevant. However, there are some changes to vm_fault.c and vm_page.c that might have some impact. I am out of time for today, now. -jr [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlPELYEACgkQls33urr0k4kTWwCgoxK68+3kYMp/HQXaApWFB2uy s7oAn3MlwR0PEczZtRaojNobd8yueYiV =I0Iw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140714212028.20059a11>