Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:20:28 +0200 From: "J.R. Oldroyd" <fbsd@opal.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?SmVhbi1Tw6liYXN0aWVuIFDDqWRyb24=?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Regression radeonkms r690 between r265233M and r268249 Message-ID: <20140714212028.20059a11@shibato> In-Reply-To: <53C2C48D.6090800@dumbbell.fr> References: <20140713163234.757f537a@shibato> <53C2C48D.6090800@dumbbell.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/E8K/5rmZ+LNkIjolqKvATkJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:40:29 +0200 Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron <jean-se= bastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> wrote: > > Hello! >=20 > I don't think commits made to sys/dev/drm2 during this period are > critical enough. >=20 > Can you try with syscons instead of vt? If you have some time, can you > bisect commits between those two dates? >=20 Bonsoir ! Ok=C3=A9e, I did some tests... None of the GENERIC/syscons kernels that I tested work with radeonkms. It always fails at init of the ring command processor. Tested: r265233, r265470, r266092, r266931 -- all fail But using the VT config and the same sources, I found: r265233 and r265289 -- these work r265470 -- this fails Most of the changes between r265289 and r265470 do not appear to be relevant. However, there are some changes to vm_fault.c and vm_page.c that might have some impact. I am out of time for today, now. -jr --Sig_/E8K/5rmZ+LNkIjolqKvATkJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlPELYEACgkQls33urr0k4kTWwCgoxK68+3kYMp/HQXaApWFB2uy s7oAn3MlwR0PEczZtRaojNobd8yueYiV =I0Iw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/E8K/5rmZ+LNkIjolqKvATkJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140714212028.20059a11>