Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:05:10 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <546604224.20050212220510@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <3689589ceb0c4136e92d14c65c5df940@chrononomicon.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050211122632.99069G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> <dcb2c27a05021200582c5750c1@mail.gmail.com> <823306184.20050212113045@wanadoo.fr> <3689589ceb0c4136e92d14c65c5df940@chrononomicon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bart Silverstrim writes: > I never quite liked these arguments. The question to ask is, "What can > I use for graphics editing on platform X? What can I use for desktop > publishing on platform Y?". Not in this case, because many of these applications must produce files that I can share with others, and/or they must work with legacy files that I've collected myself, and/or they must read files provided to me by others. So equivalent functionality isn't good enough: it has to be the same application. > Not everyone absolutely needs Photoshop to edit their family Xmas > digicam pictures. Neither do I. But I do a lot of other editing. And the average family user is better off using a turnkey commodity OS like Windows than trying to install something like UNIX. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?546604224.20050212220510>