Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:35:55 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Cc:        ache@nagual.pp.ru (=?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?=), current@FreeBSD.ORG, markm@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: entropy reseeding is totally broken
Message-ID:  <200010251035.DAA19676@usr02.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200010241816.MAA17356@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Oct 24, 2000 12:16:15 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I see the opposite.  I see that without writing to the /dev/random
> device I get a cons is an object that cares fortune 99+% of the time
> on my first login.  With it, I see more decently random fortunes (but
> I haven't done a statistical analysis of them to see how random things 
> are).

Is it just me, or have there been more problems achieving
real statistical randomness since /dev/random went in, than
at any other time in BSD history?

I booted a 1.5 system a couple of times for grins.

It gives you a different fortune each time.

Note that 1.5 "lacked" /dev/random.

Perhaps it's time to rename it as /dev/deliberate?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010251035.DAA19676>