Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:01:09 -0300 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: wine-freebsd@hub.org, Kris Moore <krismoore@comcast.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_thr.c syscalls.master src/sys/sys Message-ID: <1639123F05401A4F2A1C3F33@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <46C9E2A7.8030202@samsco.org> References: <200708160526.l7G5Qg0b008022@repoman.freebsd.org> <46C4FD02.3090708@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708162216530.1396@sea.ntplx.net> <200708182118.37998.tijl@ulyssis.org> <20070818204223.D1234@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708182050070.13363@sea.ntplx.net> <46C7A9A4.5090404@samsco.org> <20070819095302.D66918@fledge.watson.org> <222044094-1187603330-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1638751523-@bxe027.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <46C9AE64.50705@samsco.org> <20070820182905.GH87451@elvis.mu.org> <46C9E2A7.8030202@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, August 20, 2007 12:51:19 -0600 Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > I'm official out of this discussion. For the record, I have a lot of respect > for the PC-BSD guys and I'm very happy that they are doing this > work, I was just trying to provide some guidance so that this doesn't > turn into a bad hack that we regret years from now. But whatever, it's > quite obvious that my input is unwelcome. The subtle and not so subtle > attacks from you and Robert really aren't warranted at all. Please drop > me from all future emails on this subject. Thanks. Just for the record here, I think that Scott did bring up a very valid point in what he had said ... Kris did mention 'PC-BSD including it even if FreeBSD didn't' (or words to that effect), and Scott's response was only meant (at least the way I had read it) to bring us back into focus that we are better to come up with a BSD solution vs risking further forking of code ... Please note that in all of this dicussion, it is only been recent that someone mentioned a 'kld solution', which I think would be cool ... I do think that the 'mud slinging' at Scott was quite out of place ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGyeT14QvfyHIvDvMRAtTfAJ0cZXBXk9QQaj0v04HKRr0+8qjygQCgogpi Zk5Vhl+4STblk/NaMZ8Vs4k= =tOSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1639123F05401A4F2A1C3F33>