Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:17:20 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: Running Linux kernel modules. Message-ID: <200101130417.f0D4HKO21209@earth.backplane.com> References: <01C07BF3.695D3780.ggross@symark.com> <14942.32188.899333.434988@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200101130002.f0D02fk16650@earth.backplane.com> <14943.53910.930029.953797@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
: > Why not just track the opens independantly in the overloading code?
:
:I'm not sure I know what you mean. I don't just need to track
:multiple open/closes, I need to be able to hang a pointer off of
:something that I can get at durning an mmap() or ioctl() syscall so
:that I can tell which instance I'm dealing with.
:
:Drew
f_data? Or if f_data is a vnode, a field in the vnode ?
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101130417.f0D4HKO21209>