Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 00:36:36 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: "Scott D. Yelich" <scott@scottyelich.com> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Who broke "ls" in FreeBSD? and why? Message-ID: <20001024003636.G1604@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010232253210.23207-100000@hackme.spy.org>; from scott@scottyelich.com on Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:59:21PM -0600 References: <4.3.1.1.20001023213452.00b84740@ns.live.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010232253210.23207-100000@hackme.spy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:59:21PM -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote: > Would someone please be so kind as to explain to me the rationale behind > that? Why should a user or script have to be forced to get dot files > just because it's running under uid 0? This seems to really have a > major impact on portable scripts ... they have a chance to be dangerous > under FreeBSD now -- due to this setting. Could you please take this to the proper list, thanks. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> - Physics Computer Network wench To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001024003636.G1604>