Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: "Joseph A. Mallett" <jmallett@xMach.org> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Message-ID: <200105240014.f4O0EVg18944@earth.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSO.4.33.0105232002210.7978-100000@Aphex.NewGold.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
: :Looking at the patch, is it safe to assume that if there's a '/' in a :hostname, it MUST be a AF_UNIX socket? If so, wouldn't a strchr(hostp, :'/') be better than 'hostp[0] == '/''? This way one can use relative paths :as well, not just absolute ones. : :-- :[ Joseph Mallett <jmallett@xMach.org> ] [ http://srcsys.org ] 'maybe'. Generaly speaking, to ensure that we do not break some existing use of telnet it is best to be conservative. You can always do 'telnet -u relative_path' -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105240014.f4O0EVg18944>