Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:29:40 +0200 From: "Administrator" <Administrator@grove.de> To: <admin@tigergroup.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: [MailServer Resend] Resending quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity Message-ID: <D5CB4AA013EE244A80B2CEE802CF41B34B082F@TUX>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] ----- Original Message Header ----- Subject: Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity From: benlutz@datacomm.ch; To: admin@tigergroup.org; Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; ----------------------------------- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules. Use caution when accessing the contents. [-- Attachment #2 --] References: <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17" Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2005 23:05:52.0862 (UTC) FILETIME=[9232CFE0:01C59236] X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Errors-To: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <42E6BD98.1060300@tigergroup.org> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>; X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Archiving (2/030321) X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: 4.11 vs. 5.4 stablity Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 00:58:48 +0200 Message-ID: <42E6C028.6020806@datacomm.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> From: "Benjamin Lutz" <benlutz@datacomm.ch> Sender: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> To: "Eriq" <admin@tigergroup.org> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eriq wrote: > I am running 4.11 on a dual amd box and have found it solid as a rock > for running apache2, postgres, dns and postfix. But now I am thinking > of upgrading. I wonder if 5.4 is as stable for these servers that > must run 24/7. And is it worth all the trouble to do, I have grown > pretty lazy :) I'd go with that old saying, never touch a running system. 4.11 is still going to be maintained for quite a long time, so if your machine runs fine now, why not leave it as it is. If you want to upgrade, maybe you should wait a bit longer and give 6.0 a closer look (set to be released in August at the moment). My current impression is that it's stabler than 5.4 (but then, other people have reported otherwise - I suppose it's somewhat hardware-dependent). Cheers Benjamin --------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC5sAsgShs4qbRdeQRAkRiAJ9jM0unHmeJjh2aXIWzxXTUInO+VwCgjFdp vOp6J9iot78TOaptd9MdBoU= =+T5X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB8A6A259800831E80FD08C17--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D5CB4AA013EE244A80B2CEE802CF41B34B082F>