Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:17:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? Message-ID: <kg5a9j$g9u$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <CADLo83-a7yqkFhgMinGiookjvgtFuTVeGQobOepuHDCeH_wsog@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sY3_=Q4qLupBypj0jKRbpmUyKmC=QAE00D0b95oTZFzw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Just for the record, is find that it works fine for me with gcc-4.6. > 9.1-STABLE on i386 system. Building it with the default compiler results > in a successful build, but the program would simply exit after a few > seconds with no error. The exist status was 0. No messages. When I built > with 4.6, it builds and runs fine, at least for the things I've tried. > (4.6 invoked by setting WITH_GCC.) I confess I don't understand what all the fuss is about. LO *wants* to build with clang, clang is part of base, and LO builds and runs perfectly with clang (for me at any rate: 9.1-RELEASE on amd64). What is the issue? Is there some reason of which I am unaware, why people want to avoid using clang/llvm?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kg5a9j$g9u$1>