Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:20:19 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <1309842218.20050212222019@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <5df61a9fd90e3f232682f5bf3251b9ae@chrononomicon.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050211122632.99069G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <1935025570.20050211232605@wanadoo.fr> <dcb2c27a05021200582c5750c1@mail.gmail.com> <823306184.20050212113045@wanadoo.fr> <3689589ceb0c4136e92d14c65c5df940@chrononomicon.com> <546604224.20050212220510@wanadoo.fr> <5df61a9fd90e3f232682f5bf3251b9ae@chrononomicon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bart Silverstrim writes: > Thank you for supporting vendor lock-in. Recognizing, not supporting. > At any rate, what you're essentially saying is that you want to run a > particular application so no matter what happens this is what you must > have and use. Yes. > Do don't even bother asking people who will suggest alternatives, > because it's not what you want to hear. It's not a matter of what I want or don't want. I don't have any choice. That's business. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1309842218.20050212222019>