Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:19:00 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw deny or reject - not just a matter of taste? Message-ID: <86sm3ghfvf.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20050227195159.GA93630@gate.oper.dinoex.org> References: <20050227195159.GA93630@gate.oper.dinoex.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Much <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org> writes: > Maybe such things may already happen when reloading rules - that depends > on their sequence and individual layout. So it really is a good thing that > ipfw provides the atomic functions for shifting sets of rules. Look for 'ipfw set' in the ipfw man page. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86sm3ghfvf.fsf>