Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:27:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <k3dkd6$45h$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172115020.26215@wonkity.com> <k3d8td$4mq$1@ger.gmane.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209191610280.7723@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > I also find portsnap slower than either > csup or svn. That surprises me. Once the initial download and extract is done, I find "portsnap fetch update" to be miles faster than csup. However, each to his own, I suppose.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k3dkd6$45h$1>