Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 13:12:47 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> To: Ariff Abdullah <ariff@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <20070520111247.GZ23313@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070520155736.59f36b67.ariff@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070518192007.6e6a91e1@kan.dnsalias.net> <20070519182811.GW23313@hoeg.nl> <20070520155736.59f36b67.ariff@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] * Ariff Abdullah <ariff@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Any error messages? How about with snd_emu10kx instead of > snd_emu10k1 ? I don't get any error messages as far as I can see. snd_emu10kx does work. Is it worth to invest more time in this problem, better said, will the snd_emu10kx driver replace snd_emu10k1 in the near future? -- Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGUC0v52SDGA2eCwURAvdzAJ9iHbSWxZ7vlS13KUr2RfcDkLdBwACggF9W OUq/HVgOn/cylo+JsZ7CV/Q= =/mDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070520111247.GZ23313>