Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:37:30 -0700 From: Peter Kieser <pfak@telus.net> To: c0ldbyte <c0ldbyte@myrealbox.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw1sysctl and lifetime Message-ID: <4268B7CA.4090001@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <20050421075035.P51738@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net> References: <98c02f5f050421010735a3cfe2@mail.gmail.com> <98c02f5f05042104414bb668c3@mail.gmail.com> <20050421075035.P51738@eleanor.us1.wmi.uvac.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Why must you continue to respond to threads that you have no answer for, wasting our bandwidth, disk space, and time to read your useless messages? --Peter c0ldbyte wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Omar Lopez Limonta wrote: > >> I Change: >> >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300 -> 3600 >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10 -> 10 >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256 -> 1024 >> >> net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000 -> 2500 >> >> żAre good these values? , żi need chanege another value? >> > > Dont know my friend. I have no way of testing those out right now. I > assume those values are from a 5.x machine I only run 4.x's at the > moment untill I test 5.4-RELEASE more and evaluate its potential > and gain on my systems. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4268B7CA.4090001>