Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:53:00 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: James Bailie <jimmy@jamesbailie.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++? Message-ID: <8664l991pf.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <44415038.4020101@jamesbailie.com> (James Bailie's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:57:44 -0400") References: <200604151313.32519.benlutz@datacomm.ch> <4441199C.4090802@carebears.mine.nu> <44415038.4020101@jamesbailie.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
James Bailie <jimmy@jamesbailie.com> writes: > Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The > only language in which one can write more efficient programs than > in C, is assembler, but it's not portable. This is a myth. I'm surprised to see it a Lisp programmer perpetuate it. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8664l991pf.fsf>