Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:25:54 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.obj.mk Message-ID: <20040108182554.GC33759@FreeBSD.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <200401081804.i08I4EPB012056@green.bikeshed.org> References: <20040108175746.GB33759@FreeBSD.org.ua> <200401081804.i08I4EPB012056@green.bikeshed.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:04:14PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:07:32PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > > I don't see the bsd.obj.mk change as being anything but slightly more > > > correct, so I wouldn't see a good reason to remove it either way. I'm glad > > > we've clarified the issue. > > > > > I never said I want the commit to be backed out, did I? ;) > > I even see it as a slight improvement, but for a reason that > > is different from what is in the commit log -- it saves one > > make(1) invocation. I think that a null commit would be in > > order though. > > I'm not sure how I missed seeing .MAKEFLAGS -- I just went with what mostly > worked due to POLA ;-) Thanks, ru; would you like to do the null commit > clarification, or shall I? > You do please. ;) -- Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//aCyUkv4P6juNwoRAjcjAJ9H4cuDzuMbelfv2EgbSG1URbDb+QCeOTYp hv92gTeqYGwo7EoF/vRQnx8= =MNta -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040108182554.GC33759>