Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 22:43:37 +0600 (ESS) From: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su> To: cpiazza@home.net (Chris Piazza) Cc: andy@cgu.chel.su, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <199909181643.WAA04539@mail.cgu.chel.su> In-Reply-To: <19990908121255.F651@norn.ca.eu.org> from Chris Piazza at "Sep 8, 99 12:12:55 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
> > I already asked this question some time ago but can't understand,
> > why not just include/qt2 ?
> > AFAIK, most of qt-based ports use something like "#include <qt.h> and
> > addition -I${X11BASE}/include/qt2 instead of -I${QT_DIR}/include not so hard.
> > The same question for KDE. Why we install include files in include/,
> > not include/kde?
> > Maybe I missed something?
>
> You didn't miss anything. I think the intention as to follow how
> the qt142 port does things. If your idea is accepted as the better
> way it's very easy to change.
Anybody have objections for this change?
Sincerely yours, Andy
--
Tel: +7-(3512)-38-39-73, E-mail: andy@icc.surw.chel.su
WWW: http://surw.chel.su/~andy/index.html, ICQ:10705306
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909181643.WAA04539>