Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:06:38 +0100
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        ticso@cicely.de
Subject:   Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE
Message-ID:  <20050303180637.GA86348@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <9678.1109872268@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <200503022115.j22LFnWk083926@marlena.vvi.at> <9678.1109872268@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 06:51:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <200503022115.j22LFnWk083926@marlena.vvi.at>, "ALeine" writes:
> >phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: 
> >
> >> I gave up on journalling myself because IMO it complicates
> >> things a lot and the problem it solves is very very small.
> >
> >If only hardware manufacturers were to equip hard drives with
> >a mechanism to ensure atomic writes.
> 
> I would prefer "If only some bloddy laywer would stop suing
> any person who tries to market a NVRAM PCI card" :-(

Damn - there is a patent or leagal restriction on something like that?
Well - I think that many gbde users are running notebooks so
it is required to be available in other form factors as well.
I could imagine doing a USB full/high speed umass device.

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
bernd@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050303180637.GA86348>