Date: 03 Feb 1999 01:34:41 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, W Gerald Hicks <wghicks@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Lets Endorse KDE Was: some slashdot thread Message-ID: <xzpvhhkjpem.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Matthew D. Fuller"'s message of "Tue, 2 Feb 1999 18:25:57 -0600" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902011726110.3728-100000@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu> <xzpaeyxsojj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19990202182557.O16540@futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> writes: > Just to toss my personal red cents in... (hey, doesn't everbody?) > > I'm a twm person. I'm playing with ctwm now to see what I can do with > it. I love it. It's lightweight, has basically every feature I want and > a lot I don't. > > On the flip side, it DOES take a bit of work to set it up the way you > want, and the defaults suck like an intern. If we had to make a new > 'default X wm/etc', my vote would have to be for fvwm. [...] Actually, fvwm2 is less memory-hungry than twm, and has a lot more features. Don't even consider fvwm; it has no advantage over fvwm2, and its configuration syntax is very messy. Check out the fvwm2 configuration (and accompanying snapshot) I mentioned in a previous message. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpvhhkjpem.fsf>