Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:23:28 -0400 From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD STABLE <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: arp -na performance w/ many permanent entries Message-ID: <AANLkTilTBOf4jmMqajyjgdmdTRFiphIJExEjm-3T3oUG@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikHCs2x2qiinD9LRnbV0YhXsBKrUFuT_utstzUu@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilKiJDLqqwgdKIAUJY-O7jXb4A4FGyPlZZSnjyj@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimQFH5biSlhy0Bm1Cc61DF5lutMacAn_ONiSB2W@mail.gmail.com> <20100606031627.GA4742@icarus.home.lan> <AANLkTikHCs2x2qiinD9LRnbV0YhXsBKrUFuT_utstzUu@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I agree with Jeremy. I think that the problem that you've > discovered is the fact that it's using stdio-based buffered output > instead of buffering more of the contents in a string and punting it > out in larger chunks. > HTH, > -Garrett > I don't think so. The performance difference when taking out the interface lookup is huge even though the data output to STDOUT is mostly the same. I'll try the other lists, thanks.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTilTBOf4jmMqajyjgdmdTRFiphIJExEjm-3T3oUG>