Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:29:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?G=F3t_Andr=E1s?= <andrej@antiszoc.hu> To: "Dan Naumov" <dan.naumov@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: hardware for home use large storage Message-ID: <35489.188.157.184.107.1266269362.squirrel@mail.deployis.eu> In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee01002151315j3bf249a6n85e27f8f9ee64a39@mail.gmail.com> References: <cf9b1ee01002140653m7b20f60bv12b399d80bd92d9a@mail.gmail.com> <4B786D3A.3000408@langille.org> <cf9b1ee01002141442n283e4f87s50bfd3bf3c69ec60@mail.gmail.com> <4B7980E0.1020907@langille.org> <cf9b1ee01002151239w56ee87b0r67b566aba3103df@mail.gmail.com> <33955.188.157.184.107.1266267470.squirrel@mail.deployis.eu> <cf9b1ee01002151315j3bf249a6n85e27f8f9ee64a39@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Hét, Február 15, 2010 10:15 pm, Dan Naumov wrote: >>> A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For >>> the price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and >>> a 1156 socket motherboard that will run circles around that C2Q. You >>> would lose the ECC though, since that requires the more expensive 1366 >>> socket CPUs and boards. >>> >>> - Sincerely, >>> Dan Naumov >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> Do have test about this? I'm not really impressed with the i5 series. >> >> >> Regards, >> Andras >> > > There: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3634&p=10 > > > The i5 750, which is a 180 euro CPU, beats Q9650 C2Q, which is a 300 euro > CPU. > > > > - Sincerely, > Dan Naumov > > Oh, I was not up to date on price performance ratio. However I'd compare the i5 750 to the Q8400 which is also a 2,66GHz one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35489.188.157.184.107.1266269362.squirrel>