Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 04:00:35 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r221791 - projects/largeSMP/sys/sparc64/include Message-ID: <BANLkTi=weyxZDhETjki28kg_a8SadprXSw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110511215019.GU92688@alchemy.franken.de> References: <201105112115.p4BLFCGW006442@svn.freebsd.org> <BANLkTimGEiVc8Ouo0VC9zmo-q2U5sYJJMg@mail.gmail.com> <20110511215019.GU92688@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/5/11 Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:28:33PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote: >> 2011/5/11 Marius Strobl <marius@freebsd.org>: >> > Author: marius >> > Date: Wed May 11 21:15:12 2011 >> > New Revision: 221791 >> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/221791 >> >> Thanks a lot for your commit. >> I see you didn't commit yet the mp_machdep part, is that any problem with it? > > Given that I currently don't understand how the remaining problems > I'm seeing with largeSMP actually can happen I'm just using the > hack of just changing the 32-bit assembler instructions into 64-bit > ones assuming that _NCPUWORDS is 1 for now as I described earlier. > So the properly converted mp_exception.S isn't really tested so far, > which is why I haven't commited it, yet, if that's what you meant > by mp_machdep part. Yes, sorry. Could you please explain what the code you are trying to change does? Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=weyxZDhETjki28kg_a8SadprXSw>