Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:43:54 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 198092] getaddrinfo(3) fails with "Invalid value for ai_flags" (error code 3) if hint.ai_flags contains AI_V4MAPPED
Message-ID:  <bug-198092-8-NbffkStsJs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-198092-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-198092-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198092

--- Comment #5 from Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Baldwin from comment #4)

I believe the decision to be non-conforming was intentional due to security
issues that RFC presents. The internet seems torn about whether or not V4
mapped V6 addresses should have ever been created because it allows some nasty
backdoors if your firewalls don't cover this scenario.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198092-8-NbffkStsJs>