Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 23:01:26 +0200 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: why we don't build ps/pdf of /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ ? Message-ID: <20120812210125.GI1202@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <FBD8F575-BE57-4FD8-8DB6-A28CEE9F01C9@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208092302.q79N2BcA079307@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <FBD8F575-BE57-4FD8-8DB6-A28CEE9F01C9@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, 2012-08-11 at 23:45:04 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2012, at 00:02, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > > We build /usr/src/share/doc/usd/ into ascii > > documents. Is there a reason why we don't > > also build Postscript or PDF? > > I suspect since it was considered waste of space originally when it was set up. > > If anyone were to touch those docs I would suggest moving them to the doc repository instead of changing them where they currently exist as they don't really belong in src. I have this planned, but as with many things I hardly get to do any of them. The move to doc is needed to cut groff out of the base system. Cheers, Ulihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120812210125.GI1202>