Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:29:57 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r216977 - in head/libexec/rtld-elf: amd64 i386 Message-ID: <4D24D4C5.2020903@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201101051508.40337.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201101042051.p04KpSGk054564@svn.freebsd.org> <20110105185944.GA30449@freebsd.org> <4D24CD98.9080906@FreeBSD.org> <201101051508.40337.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011-01-05 21:08, John Baldwin wrote: > My suggestion was that we ask clang to add a '-mno-whatever' and hopefully we > could convince gcc to follow suit. clang developers seem to be fairly > receptive, so I was hoping one of our clang liaisons could suggest it. :) These options already exist, e.g -mno-sse -mno-sse2 and so on. The semantics of -mno-everything would be a bit hard to predict, especially with new instruction sets coming out all the time. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D24D4C5.2020903>