Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:33:07 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <44C78B33.1040704@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060726060126.GF47456@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <200607252139.k6PLd0tZ011582@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060726060126.GF47456@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 09:39:00PM +0000, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>> bmah 2006-07-25 21:39:00 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6)
>> release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml
>> Log:
>> MFC: Minidumps, padlock(7) VIA C7 support, enc(4), sysinstall(8) menu
>> titles.
>
> padlock(4) in RELENG_6 doesn't support new crypto stuff available in VIA
> C7. In RELENG_6 it only supports AES encryption. I'm planning to MFC
> this, but with the whole work I did for crypto(9) and various crypto
> drivers and I don't think I'll make it before 6.2.
Thanks for pointing this out. Given how the text reads now...
<para>The &man.padlock.4; driver now supports the cryptographic
functionality of the VIA C7 processor.</para>
...do you think it would be better to say something like "...supports
the AES encryption functions..." or just leave this out altogether?
Bruce.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEx4s32MoxcVugUsMRAk63AJ9Mq5HwylKdpsQD5xA/pinNPUIsmgCfWJbI
fRi1Sw7bzLH5RPuaNo6hFBk=
=JbNS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44C78B33.1040704>